Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 357 SO2D 1243 - Brown v. Everding

Brown v. Everding’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2017

9 state decisions

5019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 334 So. 2d 395 - Johnson v. Welsh · Reed v. Meaux · Slidell Building Sup., Inc. v. IDS Mortgage Corp. · 200 So. 2d 717 - Consolidation Loans, Inc. v. Guercio · Exchange & Banking Co. v. Walden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"No action may be instituted to set aside or annul the judicial sale of immovable property by executory process by reason of any objection to form or procedure in the executory proceedings, or by reason of the lack of authentic evidence to support the order and seizure, where the sheriff executed the foreclosure has either filed the proces verbal of the sale or filed the sale for recordation in the conveyance records of the parish. Any party seeking to annul or set aside a judicial sale of immovable property through executory proceedings filed for record before the adoption of this Section must do so within six months of September 12, 1975. Nothing herein shall be construed to affect legal defenses otherwise available to any person against whom a deficiency judgment is sought after the public sale of immovable property through executory proceedings."”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]f there are substantive defects in the executory proceedings the sale may be attacked as a nullity even though the debtor failed to exercise his right to take a suspensive appeal or enjoin the sale provided the creditor is the adjudicatee at the sale. Reed v. Meaux, 292 So.2d 557 (La.1974).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “strike at the foundation of the creditor's right to use executory process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.