357 So. 2d 271 - State v. Baxter’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2018
1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1 · 18 U.S.C. § 287
Relies on State v. Holbrook · 326 So. 2d 815 - State v. Williams · State v. Nash · State v. Hall · State v. Lewis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The rule which has long been recognized by this Court is that in order for a defendant to avail himself of the lack of qualification of a juror, it must be made to appear that the disqualification of the juror was not known to defendant, or his counsel, when the juror was accepted by him and could not then have been ascertained by due diligence; and it must be made to appear that such diligence was exercised by an examination of the juror, on his voir dire, touching his qualifications, and that he answered falsely. State v. Hall, 255 La. 854 , 233 So.2d 541 (1970); State v. Lewis, 161 La. 696 , 109 So. 391 (1926); State v. Holbrook, 153 La. 1025 , 97 So. 27 (1923); State v. Nash, 45 La.Ann. 1137 , 13 So. 732 (1893)."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he defendant has discovered, since the verdict or judgment of guilty, a prejudicial error or defect in the proceedings that, notwithstanding the exercise of reasonable diligence by the defendant, was not discovered before the verdict or judgment.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“"In order to qualify to serve as a juror, a person must: (1) Be a citizen of the United States and of this state who has resided within the parish in which he is to serve as a juror [in the instant case, St. Tammany] for at least one year immediately preceding his jury service; (2) Be at least eighteen years of age; (3) Be able to read, writ and speak the English language; (4) Not be under interdiction, or incapable of serving as a juror because of mental or physical infirmity; and (5) Not be under indictment for a felony, nor have been convicted of a felony for which he has not been pardoned."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.