Miles, Leonard’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas))
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Malik v. State · Benoit v. State · Haynes v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To prove this element, the State could show that (1) the concentration of the codeine was more than 1.8 grams of codeine per 100 milliliters, or (2) the codeine w;as not combined with active nonnarcotic ingredients in recognized therapeutic amounts or in sufficient proportion to confer on the compound valuable medicinal qualities other than those possessed by the codeine alone.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brenes v. State“Penalty Group 4 codeine consists of codeine compositions with “pot more than 200 milligrams of codeine per .100 milliliters or per 100 grams,” along with “one or more nonnarcotic active medicinal ingredients in sufficient proportion to confer on the compound’, mixture, or preparation valuable medicinal qualities other than those possessed by the narcotic drug alone.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brenes v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.