Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 357 U.S. 10 - Lewis v. National Labor Relations Board

Lewis v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

116
cited by 116 later decisions
11
cited 11 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

71 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 116 later decisions (11 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2021 · most notably National Labor Relations Board v. Plasterers' Local Union No. 79 (1971), Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. SW Gen., Inc. (2017)

71 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

56019581960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedNational Labor Relations Board v. Lewis (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations Board · Kimbrough v. United States · Cudahy Packing Co. v. Holland · National Labor Relations Board v. Duval Jewelry Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “separat[ing] the prosecuting from the adjudicating function, to place the former in the General Counsel, and to make him an independent official appointed by the President.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Within, five days after the service of a subpena on any person requiring the production of any evidence in his possession or under his control, such person may petition the Board to revoke, and the Board shall revoke, such subpena if in its opinion the evidence whose production is required does not relate to any matter under investigation, or any matter in question in such proceedings, or if in its opinion such subpena does not describe with sufficient particularity the evidence whose production is required.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The [Commission], or any member thereof, shall upon application of any party to such proceedings, forthwith issue to such party subpenas requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses or the production of any evidence in such proceeding or investigation requested in such application.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.