Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 357 U.S. 116 - Kent v. Dulles

Kent v. Dulles’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

1,140
cited by 1,140 later decisions
121
cited 121 times by the Supreme Court
25
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

356 federal appellate · 133 district · 200 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,140 later decisions (121 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Roe v. Wade (1973), Griswold v. State of Connecticut (1965)

356 federal appellate · 133 district · 200 state decisions — followed in 25 states

290019581960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedKent v. Dulles (from District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Cantwell v. State of Connecticut · Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer · Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan · Korematsu v. United States

Cited together with Aptheker v. Secretary of State · Zemel v. Rusk · Shapiro v. Thompson · Haig v. Agee · United States v. Guest

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,140 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he right to travel is a part of the 'liberty' of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.”
    40 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he Secretary of State may grant and issue passports ... under such rules as the President shall designate and prescribe for and on behalf of the United States.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “it shall, except as otherwise provided by the President and subject to such limitations and exceptions as the President may authorize and prescribe, be unlawful for any citizen of the United States to depart from or enter or attempt to depart from or enter the United States unless he bears a valid passport.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.