Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 357 U.S. 433 - Crooker v. State of California

Crooker v. State of California’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

1,060
cited by 1,060 later decisions
51
cited 51 times by the Supreme Court
37
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

388 federal appellate · 42 district · 408 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,060 later decisions (51 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2024 · most notably Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera (1966), Escobedo v. Illinois (1964)

388 federal appellate · 42 district · 408 state decisions — followed in 37 states

683019581960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Brown v. Allen · McNabb v. United States · Townsend v. Burke

Cited together with Cicenia v. Lagay · Spano v. People of the State of New York · Escobedo v. Illinois · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Gideon v. Wainwright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,060 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that fundamental fairness essential to the very concept of justice.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “state financial aid for her infant children would be cut off, and her children taken from her, if she did not 'cooperate' "; subsequent confession held involuntary). 20 Jurek was not "a college graduate who had attended the first year of law school.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “less rigid and more fluid than those envisaged in other specific and particular provisions of the Bill of Rights;”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.