357 Wis. 2d 565 - State v. Anker’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Murray v. United States · 90 Wis. 2d 97 - Charolais Breeding Ranches, Ltd. v. FPC Securities Corp. · 50 Wis. 2d 619 - State v. Paszek · 115 Wis. 2d 641 - Noll v. Dimiceli's, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Burnside, ¶ 7. All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2013 — 14 version unless otherwise noted. While the circuit court noted that Quigley was required to cooperate with the police because he was on probation, Quigley does not develop any argument that his probation status required him to go to the station or prohibited him from leaving. Under the inevitable discovery doctrine, which was not developed by the State, illegally obtained evidence is admissible if the state can show that it”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.