In Re St. Casimir Development Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 365 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Moody v. Amoco Oil Co. · Stoltz v. J · In Re Cardinal Industries, Inc. · Shell Oil Co. v. Anne Cara Oil Co. (In Re Anne Cara Oil Co.) · Prima US Inc M/v Addiriyah Her Engines Boilers Etc United Arab Shipping Company Westinghouse Electric Corp v. Panalpina Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The wording could not be clearer: after [the limited partner] serves a ten day notice of intent to remove on the Debt- or — and ten days pass — [the limited partner] has the right to remove the General Partner but does not have to exercise that right. Thus, under the scheme contemplated by the Partnership Agreement, [the limited partner] must serve a ten day notice of intent to remove, wait for the ten days to pass, and then exercise its right (which it has no obligation to exercise) to remove the Debtor from its position, in order to effect the removal. The scheme devised by the parties is a classic example of a condition subsequent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.