Rocker v. Celebrezze’s Empirical Analysis
358 F.2d 119 · 1966
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 1993 · most notably Cohen v. Perales (1969), 283 F. Supp. 797 - Spindel v. Spindel (1968)
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Williams v. State of North Carolina · Boesche v. Udall · Nelson v. County of Los Angeles · Remington Rand, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[I]f Mathilde had not been properly served in Louis’ divorce action, Nevada would deny the effectiveness of its own decree because of defective jurisdiction. . . . But, here, a conflict existed between the affidavit of the process server filed in the Nevada divorce suit, stating that Ma-thilde had been personally served, and Mathilde’s testimony in the New York suit, asserting that process had been left in her mailbox. Since this dispute was essentially one of credibility which the Hearing Examiner, based on evidence before him, resolved against Mathilde, we cannot fault his conclusion that Nevada obtained jurisdiction over Louis’ suit for divorce.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. James v. Richardson“Evidence may be received at the hearing even though inadmissible under rules of evidence applicable to court procedure * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cohen v. Perales“rules governing the admission of evidence ... are considerably more relaxed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.