Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

358 F.2d 310

Docket No. 22236.

Little v. United States

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1966.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1966-03-31

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1966

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1966-03-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1George M. Leppert, New Orleans, La., Hal Gerber, Memphis, Tenn., for appellant.

¶2F. D. Fitzgibbon, Jr., U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., John C. Ciolino, Asst. U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., John A. Newton, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., Richard D. FitzGibbon, Jr., U. S. Atty., Eastern District of Missouri, Louis C. LaCour, U. S. Atty., Eastern District of Louisiana, for appellee.

¶3Before JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5The appellant was convicted of an offense in violation of the Federal law in the Eastern District of Missouri. After a motion for new trial was overruled, he surrendered himself in Louisiana and seeks relief from the judgment of conviction and sentence by an application for habeas corpus in the District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. He has made no application under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. This Court has concluded that the relief which he seeks can be granted, if at all, only by the court in which he was convicted and pursuant to the remedies provided by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The judgment of the district court denying relief on the application for a writ of habeas corpus is

¶6Affirmed.

/358/f2d/310 · .json · Public domain