Kirby v. Shaw’s Empirical Analysis
358 F.2d 446 · 1966
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 1994
5 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Storer Broadcasting Co. · Reilly v. Pinkus · Carmen Gonzalez v. Orville L. Freeman · Hannegan v. Esquire, Inc. · Cates v. Haderlein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“before a fraud order may be issued. Moreover, the power conferred upon the Postmaster General to impound and refuse to deliver mail to persons conducting fraudulent schemes must be”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mark Eden v. Lim P..“zealously watched and strictly confined.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mark Eden v. Lim P..
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.