Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 358 F.2d 520 - Keyworth C. Birch, Jr. v. Sam A. Anderson

Keyworth C. Birch, Jr. v. Sam A. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

358 F.2d 520 · 1965

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
3
states following
August 1994
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently August 1994 · most notably Shelton v. United States Board of Parole (1967), Frost v. State (1994)

28 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

1901965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Zerbst v. Kidwell · Anderson v. Corall · Hyser v. Reed · Mock v. U. S. Board of Parole · Schiffman v. Wilkinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “deemed as if released on parole until the expiration of the maximum term or terms for which he was sentenced less one hundred and eighty days.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A warrant for the retaking of any United States prisoner who has violated his parole, may be issued only by the Board of Parole or a member thereof and within the maximum term or terms for which he was sentenced. The unexpired term of imprisonment of any such prisoner shall begin to run from the date he is returned to the custody of the Attorney General under said warrant, and the time the prisoner was on parole shall not diminish the time he was sentenced to serve.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It might well be, as was said in Lavendera v. Taylor, 234 F.Supp. 703, 705 (D.Kan.), '[a] parole violator's warrant that is issued during the period of parole may be executed during the terminal 180-day period of the full sentence.' [Emphasis in the original.] But that is not our case, though the warrant could have been issued prior to the beginning of the 180 days.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.