Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 358 F.3d 1181 - Alsea Valley Alliance v. Department of Commerce

Alsea Valley Alliance v. Department of Commerce’s Empirical Analysis

358 F.3d 1181 · 2004

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. United States Bureau of Reclamation (2005), Sierra Forest Legacy v. Sherman (2011)

16 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

200200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chrysler Corporation v. Brown · Carson v. American Brands, Inc. · Good Samaritan Hospital v. Shalala · Idaho Farm Bureau Federation v. Babbitt · Fertilizer Institute v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the district court conclusively resolves a separable legal issue, (2) the remand order forces the agency to apply a potentially erroneous rule which may result in a wasted proceeding, and (3) review would, as a practical matter, be foreclosed if an immediate appeal were unavailable.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[o]rdinarily when a regulation is not promulgated in compliance with the APA, the regulation is invalid.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “Although not without exception, vacatur of an unlawful agency action normally accompanies a remand.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.