358 F. Supp. 2d 688 - Reynolds v. Solectron Global Services’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Ang v. Procter & Gamble Co. · Rmi Titanium Company v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation · People of State of California Van De Kamp v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency · DLX, Inc. v. Kentucky · Parry v. Mohawk Motors of Michigan, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Federal courts do not have subject matter jurisdiction over a plaintiff's claim if that plaintiff fails to raise a Title VII claim before the EEOC.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. B.L. v. Schuhmann
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.