Hechavarria v. Whitaker’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (§ 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Fay v. Noia · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Addington v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the evidence itself could not -- as a matter of law -- have supported”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Diaz Ortiz v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.