State v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 13 U.S.C. § 141 · 13 U.S.C. § 6 · 29 U.S.C. § 3162 · 29 U.S.C. § 3163 · 29 U.S.C. § 3173 · 42 U.S.C. § 12747 · 42 U.S.C. § 5306 · 5 U.S.C. § 702
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission · Bennett v. Spear
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under Alternative C, there will be error in the administrative records, but we believe these to be relatively limited due[ ] to the procedure follow[ed] by SSA, USCIS and State. In both Alternative[s], the modeled cases will be subject to prediction error. ... Alternative D has an additional source or error, response error. This is where 2020 respondent give the incorrect status. Statisticians often hope these error[s] are random and cancel out. However, we know from prior research that citizenship status responses are systematically biased for a subset of noncitizens. Response error is only an issue in alternative D.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[h]ouseholds deciding not to self-respond because of the citizenship question are likely to refuse to cooperate with enumerators coming to their door.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“reports that he has discussed this with the Under Secretary [Karen Dunn Kelley], and she agrees with the recommendation of Alternative C.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.