358 Ill. App. 3d 612 - People v. Binion’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 215 Ill. 2d 167 - People v. Herron · 208 Ill. 2d 53 - People v. Johnson · 89 Ill. 2d 322 - People v. Whitlow · 102 Ill. 2d 54 - People v. Albanese · 153 Ill. 2d 365 - People v. Speight
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘You just heard some testimony concerning this witness’s trip to take a lie detector test, okay. Now, the results of a lie detector test are not admissible in evidence. And I don’t want you to try to surmise what the [result] of that lie detector was one way or the other. The only reason that you are hearing testimony concerning [the witness] going to the lie detector test was to place that trip chronologically within the course of the police investigation. And you’re to consider it for that purpose only. I’m specifically instructing you not to attempt to surmise what the results of that lie detector test was, okay.’ ” Binion, 358 Ill. App. 3d at 616-17 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.