Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 358 Ill. App. 3d 718 - People v. Baugh

358 Ill. App. 3d 718 - People v. Baugh’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably 392 Ill. App. 3d 243 - People v. Phillips (2009), 371 Ill. App. 3d 382 - People v. Ward (2007)

39 state decisions

170200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 122 Ill. 2d 176 - People v. Enoch · 104 Ill. 2d 504 - People v. Albanese · 128 Ill. 2d 1 - People v. Young · 189 Ill. 2d 99 - People v. Blue · 185 Ill. 2d 81 - People v. Kliner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(a) A person who is not a peace officer acting in the line of duty commits home invasion when without authority he or she knowingly enters the dwelling place of another when he or she knows or has reason to know that one or more persons is present or he or she knowingly enters the dwelling place of another and remains in such dwelling place until he or she knows or has reason to know that one or more persons is present and (1) While armed with a dangerous weapon, other than a firearm, uses force or threatens the imminent use of force upon any person or persons within such dwelling place whether or not injury occurs, or (2) Intentionally causes any injury, except as provided in subsection (a)(5), to any person or persons within such dwelling place, or (3) While armed with a firearm uses force or threatens the imminent use of force upon any person or persons within such dwelling place whether or not injury occurs, or (4) Uses force or threatens the imminent use of force upon any person or persons within such dwelling place whether or not injury occurs and during the commission of the offense personally discharges a firearm, or (5) Personally discharges a firearm that proximately causes great bodily harm, permanent disability, permanent disfigurement, or death to another person within such dwelling place, or (6) Commits, against any person or persons within that dwelling place, a violation of Section 12 — 13, 12 — 14, 12 — 14.1, 12— 15, or 12 — 16 of the Criminal Code of 1961. ”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The trial court accepted the diagnosis of narcolepsy but ruled that there was no credible [evidence] to conclude that narcolepsy impaired defendant to the extent that he was unable to assist counsel in his defense. Specifically, the trial court noted that defendant was present for numerous pretrial court proceedings and always appeared awake, alert and able to comprehend what was going on. The court took judicial notice that defendant sat at the table with his counsel for 40 minutes during the fitness hearing and there was no indication that defendant ever fell asleep or became confused.” Baugh, 358 Ill. App. 3d at 723 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““(1) The defendant’s knowledge and understanding of the charge, the proceedings, the consequences of a plea, judgment or sentence, and the functions of the participants in the trial process; (2) The defendant’s ability to observe, recollect and relate occurrences, especially those concerning the incidents alleged, and to communicate with counsel; (3) The defendant’s social behavior and abilities; orientation as to time and place; recognition of persons, places and things; and performance of motor processes.” 725 ILCS 5/104 — 16(b) (West 2004).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.