Doe v. Doe’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
51 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Dua v. Comcast Cable of Maryland, Inc. (2002), Bushey v. Northern Assurance Co. of America (2001)
51 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tinker v. Colwell · Huntington v. City of New York · Murphy v. Edmonds · Ashton v. Brown · Boblitz v. Boblitz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Article 19 [of the Maryland Declaration of Rights] insures that rights belonging to Marylanders are ‘not illegally or arbitrarily denied by the government.’ State v. Board of Education, 346 Md. 633, 647 , 697 A.2d 1334, 1341 (1997). Furthermore, under Article 19, ‘a plaintiff injured by unconstitutional state action should have a remedy to redress the wrong.’ Ashton v. Brown, 339 Md. 70, 105 , 660 A.2d 447, 464-465 (1995). See Weyler v. Gibson, 110 Md. 636, 653-654 , 73 A. 261, 263 (1909). Moreover, even with regard to causes of action not based upon constitutional violations, ‘Article 19 does guarantee access to the courts.’ Johnson v. Maryland State Police, 331 Md. 285, 297 , 628 A.2d 162, 168 (1993). See also, e.g., Renko v. McLean, 346 Md. 464, 484 , 697 A.2d 468, 478 (1997); Murphy v. Edmonds, 325 Md. 342, 365 , 601 A.2d 102, 113 (1992); Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. v. Coupard, 304 Md. 340, 360 , 499 A.2d 178, 189 (1985).””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Robinson v. Bunch · Lee v. Cline“That every man, for any injury done to him in his person or property, ought to have remedy by the course of the Law of the land, and ought to have justice and right, freely without sale, fully without any denial, and speedily without delay, according to the Law of the land.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““We find nothing in our prior cases or elsewhere to indicate that under the common law of Maryland a wife was not permitted to recover from her husband in tort when she alleged and proved the type of outrageous, intentional conduct here alleged.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bozman v. Bozman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.