Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 358 N.C. 92 - State v. Webb

State v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
3
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Fuller v. Oregon · Schilb v. Kuebel · Dollar v. United States · C. D. Spangler Construction Co. v. Industrial Crankshaft & Engineering Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[c]onstitutional provisions should be construed in consonance with the objects and purposes in contemplation at the time of their adoption. To ascertain the intent of those by whom the language was used, we must consider the conditions as they then existed and the purpose sought to be accomplished."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] convicted defendant is entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard before a valid judgment for costs can be entered. Costs are imposed only at sentencing, so any convicted [] defendant is given notice of the appointment fee at the sentencing hearing and is also given an opportunity to be heard and object to the imposition of this cost.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “The results yielded by our historical review is [sic] consistent with a plain meaning analysis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.