Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 358 NW2D 143 - Tester v. Jefferson Lines

Tester v. Jefferson Lines’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
November 1994
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on White v. Metropolitan Medical Center · Lumpkin v. North Central Airlines, Inc. · Chellson v. State Division of Employment & Security · Windsperger v. Broadway Liquor Outlet · Ramirez v. Metro Waste Control Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The employer had a right to expect Tester to refrain from uttering unprovoked obscenities and from actively obstructing the employer’s buses. We cannot bring either the obscene comment or blocking of the bus under the isolated hotheaded incident exception to the misconduct definition. * * sit ⅜ * * The strike was not against Tester’s employer, and his conduct cannot be excused as normal picket-line activity. Because both incidents occurred in the presence of other employees and could have incited other aggressive behavior, they were likely to interfere with the employer’s business.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The employer had a right to expect Tester to refrain from uttering unprovoked obscenities at management personnel and from actively obstructing the employer’s buses. * * * Sic * * The strike was not against Tester’s employer, and his conduct cannot be excused as normal picket-line activity. Because both incidents occurred in presence of other employees and could have incited other aggressive behavior, they were likely to interfere with the employer’s business.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.