State v. Guzek’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[W]e have held that a trial court must make a record of its factual findings and reasoning in support of its order requiring a defendant to wear a stun belt. The purpose of those findings is to facilitate appellate review. *** [T]he standard for determining error in the sufficiency of the judicial record is a functional one-namely, whether the record reveals the findings and reasoning for the court's actions.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 295 Or. App. 246 - State v. Colby

2. “if the substance of the requested jury instruction, even if correct, was covered fully by other jury instructions given by the trial court.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 292 Or. App. 232 - State v. Harrison

3. “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have the right * * * to be heard by himself and counsel.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Ball