Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 358 OR 565 - State v. Suppah

State v. Suppah’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in giving the deputy a false name and address ..., defendant knowingly chose to do something other than what the deputy had asked. ... The reason for defendant's misrepresentation was unconnected, other than in a 'but-for' sense, from the unlawful stop that preceded it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “the stop had no appreciable effect on the defendant's decision to give the deputy a false name and date of birth,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “attenuated the taint of the unlawful stop.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.