Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 358 SO2D 1129 - Moore v. State

Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 1979
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 339 So. 2d 1164 - Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Pridgen · 254 So. 2d 207 - State Ex Rel. Maines v. Baker · 332 So. 2d 146 - State v. May · Hall v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE 180-DAY RULE, DOES THE TRIAL COMMENCE UNDER RULE 3.191(a)(3) WHEN THE INITIAL OATH IS ADMINISTERED TO A LARGE PROSPECTIVE PANEL UNDER RULE 3.300(a) OR DOES THE TRIAL COMMENCE WHEN THE PANEL IS SEATED FOR VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.