Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 358 SO2D 1243 - State v. Labostrie

State v. Labostrie’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably 406 So. 2d 1331 - State v. Edwards (1981), State v. Knighton (1983)

32 state decisions

21019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 350 So. 2d 615 - State v. Sheppard · 315 So. 2d 675 - State v. Carlisle · State v. Findley · 345 So. 2d 874 - State v. Passman · State v. Fink

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The state shall not, in the opening statement, advert in any way to a confession or inculpatory statement made by the defendant.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he term `inculpatory statement' refers to the out-of-court admission of incriminating facts made by a defendant after the crime has been committed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The court, on application of the prosecuting attorney, or on application of the defendant shall grant a severance of offenses whenever: (a) if before trial, it is deemed appropriate to promote a fair determination of the defendant's guilt or innocence of each offense; or (b) if during the trial upon consent of the defendant, it is deemed necessary to achieve a fair determination of the defendant's guilt or innocence of each offense. The Court shall consider whether, in view of the number of offenses charged and the complexity of the evidence to be offered, the trier of fact will be able to distinguish the evidence and apply the law intelligently as to each offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.