Davis v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 138 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 144 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably 397 So. 2d 1120 - Tibbs v. State (1981), 395 So. 2d 492 - Peek v. State (1981)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 138 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 145 So. 2d 291 - Peteler v. Peteler · 283 So. 2d 342 - First National Bank of St. Petersburg v. Ford · Stern v. Stern · 164 So. 2d 219 - Carter v. Carter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 144 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When either party is about to remove himself or his property out of the state, or fraudulently convey or conceal it, the court may award a ne exeat or injunction against him or his property and make such orders as will secure alimony to the party who should receive it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.