Richards v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1981
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gautney v. State · 39 Ala. App. 361 - Golden v. State · 117 So. 2d 104 - Day v. National-US Radiator Corporation · 37 Ala. App. 603 - Sanford v. State · Green v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““15. If the evidence, or any part thereof, after a consideration of the whole of such evidence, generates a well-founded doubt of defendant’s guilty, the jury must acquit him.” “71. The Court charges the jury that, if the jury, upon considering all the evidence, have a reasonable doubt about the defendant’s guilt, arising out of any part of the evidence, you should find him not guilty.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Atkins v. State““ ‘D. 4 I charge you that if you have a reasonable doubt of James Richards’ guilt growing out of the evidence or any part of it, you must acquit him.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tillman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.