State v. Berry’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 2000
2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Federal Trade Commission v. National Casualty Co. · Anderson v. Bryson · 95 So. 2d 20 - Ennis v. State · 333 So. 2d 63 - Prince v. State · Berry v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to obtain any services, goods, wares, or other things of value by means of a check ... knowing at the time of the making, drawing, uttering, issuing, or delivering of such check or draft that the maker thereof has not sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with such bank or depository with which to pay the same upon presentation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miranda v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.