Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 358 SW3D 126 - State v. Murphy

State v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Payton v. New York · Gerstein v. Pugh · Frisbie v. Collins · United States v. Crews

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The State failed to file a respondent's brief in this matter. Briefs by both parties are encouraged in order to give all parties the opportunity to aide [sic] the court in reaching a proper decision. The failure of a respondent to file a brief on appeal is an imposition on the court and leaves us dependent upon an appellant's presentation and our own research; however, because no penalty is imposed by statute or rule, we proceed to determine the case on its merits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.