Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

358 U.S. 39

Steinbeck v. Gerosa

Supreme Court of the United States · decided October 13, 1958

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“for want of a substantial federal question,”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 69 Cal. 2d 613 - In Re Anderson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided October 13, 1958

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2003 · most notably McGautha v. California (1971), Coppedge v. United States (1962)

15 federal appellate · 45 state decisions — followed in 10 states

290195819601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Irwin Karp, for appellant.

Messrs. Peter Campbell Brown and Stanley Buchsbaum for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a federal question · Case Law">substantial federal question.

¶2

Mr. Justice BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

/358/us/39 · .json · Public domain