Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 358 WIS2D 368 - State v. Chew

State v. Chew’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2022
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2022

5 state decisions

6020142020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County · 213 Wis. 2d 488 - State v. Castillo · State v. Head · State v. Popenhagen · State v. Hubbard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(ar) If an actor [here, Mouth,] intentionally used force that was intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm, the court may not consider whether the actor had an opportunity to flee or retreat before he or she used force and shall presume that the actor reasonably believed that the force was necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself if the actor makes such a claim under sub. (1) [defining self-defense] and either of the following applies: 1. The person against whom the force was used [here, Dreger and GSP] was in the process of unlawfully and forcibly entering the actor's ... place of business, the actor was present in the ... place of business, and the actor knew or reasonably believed that an unlawful and forcible entry was occurring. 2. The person against whom the force was used was in the actor's ... place of business after unlawfully and forcibly entering it, the actor was present in the ... place of business, and the actor knew or reasonably believed that the person had unlawfully and forcibly entered the ... place of business.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “generally provides that use of force is presumably justified when a person is defending himself ... against an unlawful and forcible intruder in that person's home.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'Dwelling' includes other existing structures on the immediate residential premises, such as driveways, sidewalks, swimming pools, terraces, patios, fences, porches, garages, and basements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.