Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 359 Ark. 443 - Jones v. Flowers

Jones v. Flowers’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2020

14 state decisions

100200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams · Dusenbery v. United States · Hodges v. Huckabee · Raymond v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the burden of providing a record sufficient to demonstrate error is upon the appellant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.