Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 359 F.2d 285 - Gilbert v. United States

Gilbert v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

359 F.2d 285 · 1966

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
7
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably State v. Warner (1990), United States v. Dandy (1993)

25 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

140196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 495 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206

Relies on Pereira v. United States · Lawn v. United States · Sinclair v. United States · United States v. Gilliland · In Re the Accounting of Totten

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““in keeping with the statute’s ‘vital public purpose of protecting governmental functions from frustration and distortion through deceptive practices * * * it must not be construed as if its object were narrow and technical.’ . . .” Gilbert v. United States, 359 F.2d 285, 287 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 882 , 87 S.Ct. 169 , 17 L.Ed.2d 109 (1966).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “certainly was aware that the endorsement of the [U.S.] checks was the first crucial step in their journey to the Treasury Department where they would be ultimately presented for payment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.