Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

359 F.2d 433

Docket No. 10332.

United States v. Williams

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued April 5, 1966.

Decided April 8, 1966.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1966-04-08

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1966

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1966-04-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Richard S. Tilley, Roanoke, Va. (Court-assigned counsel) [Tilley & Ped-igo, Roanoke, Va., on the brief] for appellant.

¶2William C. Breckinridge, Asst. U. S. Atty., for appellee.

¶3Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, BOREMAN, Circuit Judge, and BARKS-DALE, District Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5Appellant, defendant below, was convicted by a jury on a charge of theft from an interstate shipment in violation of Title 18 U.S.C., Section 659. At the time of the theft the shipment was being transported from New Jersey to Arkansas by the defendant in his employer's truck. The only point of error urged on this appeal is the admission in evidence, over objection, of certain waybills or shipping orders pertaining to the interstate shipment prepared by the shippers and signed by the defendant.

¶6Upon consideration of the record, the briefs and oral arguments of counsel, we perceive no reversible error. Therefore, the judgment below will be affirmed.

¶7Affirmed.

/359/f2d/433 · .json · Public domain