Richard C. Loshbough v. Kenneth C. Allen’s Empirical Analysis
359 F.2d 910 · 1966
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 1995
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Foman v. Davis · In re Allen · In re Grier · In re Robertshaw
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for that board to consider the motion pending before it, which it refused to consider because we had jurisdiction of the case, and to take whatever further action it may deem advisable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to `cancel' from the interference the 5 counts on which priority was awarded to him and to substitute a new count.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“with the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ferree v. Shephard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.