Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 359 F.2d 960 - Jacobs v. United States

Jacobs v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

359 F.2d 960 · 1966

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
March 1992
most recently cited

12 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 1992

12 federal appellate ·

701966197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 714 · 15 U.S.C. § 714M · 7 U.S.C. § 1441

Relies on Federal Crop Ins Corporation v. Merrill · Douglas v. Alabama · Estes v. Texas · Rainwater v. United States · United States v. Resnick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whoever makes any statement knowing it to be false, ... for the purpose of influencing in any way the action of the Corporation, or for the purpose of obtaining for himself or another, money, property, or anything of value ... shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished____”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “carelessness or lack of wisdom is not equivalent to [a] knowledge of falsity . . ..”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.