Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 359 F.3d 1049 - Weyers v. Lear Operations Corp.

Weyers v. Lear Operations Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

359 F.3d 1049 · 2004

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Faragher v. City of Boca Raton · Monge v. California · Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth · Parkins v. Civil Constructors of Illinois, Inc. · Breeding v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]o be considered a supervisor, “the alleged harasser must have had the power (not necessarily exercised) to take tangible employment action against the victim, such as the authority to hire, fire, promote or reassign to significantly different duties.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “apparent authority would be an insufficient basis to support a finding of supervisor status”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “with immediate (or successively higher) authority over the employee”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.