Evangelista v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
359 F.3d 145 · 2004
Citation profile
44 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 78 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2024 · most notably Zhang v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service (2004), Patterson v. Balsamico (2006)
44 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7201 · 26 U.S.C. § 7202 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 50 U.S.C. § 421 (§ 601 of the National Security Act of 1947) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (§ 274 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Sansone v. United States · Alaska v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`arbitrary, capricious, or manifestly contrary to the statute.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“deportable” from time to time in this opinion as well-worn colloquialisms for”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an offense relating to commercial bribery, counterfeiting, forgery, or trafficking in vehicles the identification numbers of which have been altered for which the term of imprisonment is at least one year.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kamagate v. Ashcroft
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.