Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 359 F.3d 59 - Laurent v. Ashcroft

Laurent v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

359 F.3d 59 · 2004

Citation profile

102
cited by 102 later decisions
August 2024
most recently cited

60 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 102 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Bocova v. Gonzales (2005), Nikijuluw v. Gonzales (2005)

60 federal appellate · 1 district ·

760200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Liteky et al United States · Lukwago v. Ashcroft · Aguilar-Solis v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Alvarez-Flores v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he [BIA's] determination must stand `unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary,'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “points unerringly in the opposite direction.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a person who has been forced to abort a pregnancy or to undergo involuntary sterilization, or who has been persecuted for failure or refusal to undergo such a procedure or for other resistance to a coercive population control program, shall be deemed to have been persecuted on account of political opinion, and a person who has a well founded fear that he or she will be forced to undergo such a procedure or subject to persecution for such failure, refusal, or resistance shall be deemed to have a well founded fear of persecution on account of political opinion.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.