Fredrickson v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis
359 F.3d 972 · 2004
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
February 2017
most recently cited
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Polaski v. Heckler · Krogmeier v. Barnhart · McKinney v. Apfel · Brown v. Chater · Roberts v. Heckler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is no evidence in the record that [the claimant] complained of severe pain to his physicians or that they prescribed that he elevate his foot or lie down daily.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Substantial evidence is less than a preponderance, but is enough that a reasonable mind would find it adequate to support the Commissioner's conclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stormo v. Barnhart“The ALJ must determine a claimant's RFC based on all of the relevant evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Reed v. Barnhart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.