Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 359 FSUPP 124 - Osmond v. Spence

Osmond v. Spence’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
December 1990
most recently cited

1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 1990

1 district · 4 state decisions

60197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Boddie v. Connecticut · Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View · D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co. · SWARB Et Al. v. LENNOX Et Al.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “before the judgment is entered, an alleged debtor will be deprived of his due process rights on every occasion when an effective waiver has not occurred.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.