Mandelkorn v. Patrick’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 24 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably First Chicago International v. United Exchange Co. (1988), Reuber v. United States (1984)
22 federal appellate · 24 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. · Griffin v. Breckenridge · Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Holland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If sufficient allegations appear of the acts of one defendant among the conspirators, causing damage to the plaintiff, and the act of the particular defendant was done pursuant to the conspiracy, during its course, in furtherance of the objects of the conspiracy, with the requisite purpose and intent ... then all defendants are liable for acts of the particular defendant under the general principle of agency on which conspiracy is based.””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[M]ere allegations of conspiracy, and even the presence of one co-conspirator within the jurisdiction, do not give jurisdiction over all the alleged co-conspirators. . to meet due process requirements there must be a factual showing of a conspiracy and also of a connection between the acts of the conspirator who was present in the jurisdiction and the conspirator who was absent. . . . As an analogy, to establish an agency relationship under the New York long-arm statute there must be specific facts that show that the principal had requested the agent to perform purposeful acts in New York for the principal’s benefit. 319 F.Supp. at 1261-1262 , cited in Mandelkorn v. Patrick, supra, 359 F.Supp. at 695-696 . See also Albert Levine Associates v. Bertoni & Cotti, 309 F.Supp. 456, 458 (D.C.S.D.N.Y.1970).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is emphasized, however, that the situation would be quite different on this point, if the [conspiracy] allegations of the complaint were controverted or if the facts should develop otherwise than as alleged.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.