Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 359 F. Supp. 2d 2 - Clements v. Maloney

359 F. Supp. 2d 2 - Clements v. Maloney’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
January 2010
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Rose v. Lundy · California v. Green · Picard v. Connor · Duncan v. Henry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “] (C) Whether the Appeals Court failed to address Clements' claim that instructions to deliberating jurors to ignore the opinion of the lone holdout invaded the province of the jury and violated Clements' right to a fair trial pursuant to the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution as well as Article XII of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights? [the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Clements v. Maloney
  2. “staying the petition pending the pursuit of new relief in the state courts should be reserved only for exceptional cases where it would be inequitable or unjust to do otherwise, such as where it was impossible or impracticable for the petitioner to have pursued the unexhausted claims in the state proceedings that resolved the exhausted ones.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Clements v. Maloney
  3. “] (B) Whether the jury's special verdict, finding the defendant guilty as a joint venturer but not as the princip[al] of the crime of second degree murder was supported by sufficient evidence to convict? [the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Clements v. Maloney

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.