Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 359 Mich. 33 - Montgomery v. Stephan

Montgomery v. Stephan’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

121
cited by 121 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
23
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 5 district · 75 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 121 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2016 · most notably 12 Cal. 3d 382 - Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. (1974), American Export Lines, Inc. v. Alvez (1980)

27 federal appellate · 5 district · 75 state decisions — followed in 23 states

620196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 121 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Were we to rule upon precedent alone, were stability the only reason for our being, we would have no trouble with this case. We would simply tell the woman to begone, and to take her shattered husband with her, that we need no longer be affronted by a sight so repulsive. In doing so we would have vast support from the dusty books. But dust [from] the decision would remain in our mouths through the years ahead, a reproach to law and conscience alike. Our oath is to do justice, not perpetuate error.' Id. at 37-38 , 101 N.W.2d at 229 .”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[r]elief is extended to the wife in [these] * * * cases for one basic reason, the interest of society in the protection of the family * * *. If this is the interest to be protected, * * * the law's protection should extend as well to the negligent as to the intentional injury.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““This, then, is the soil in which the doctrine took root; the abject subservience of wife to husband, her legal nonexistence, her degraded position as a combination vessel, chattel, and household drudge whose obedience might be enforced by personal chastisement.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.