State v. Bryant’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
61 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4042 (Prison Camera Reform Act of 2021)
Relies on United States v. Salerno · Benton v. Maryland · Rochin v. People of California · Hamling v. United States · Palko v. State of Connecticut
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]o be entitled to relief under the decidedly narrow Lambert exception, a defendant must establish that his conduct was "wholly passive" such that "circumstances which might move one to inquire as to the necessity of registration are completely lacking" and that [the] defendant was ignorant of his duty to register and there was no reasonable probability that [the] defendant knew his conduct was illegal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[T]he presumption is that any act passed by the legislature is constitutional, and the court will not strike it down if [it] can be upheld on any reasonable ground.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“to the general rule that ignorance of the law is no excuse”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.