359 N.J. Super. 333 - Lonza, Inc. v. Hartford Acc. Co.’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Byrne v. United States · Voorhees v. Preferred Mutual Insurance · Arizona v. Evans · Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident Insurance · Veazey v. Doremus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the competing interests of the relevant states, (2) the national interests of commerce among the several states, (3) the interests of the parties, [and (4)] the interests of judicial administration.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Any such conflict is to be determined on an issue-by-issue basis.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“This rule is to be applied unless the dominant and significant relationship of another state to the parties and the underlying issue dictates that this basic rule should yield.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.