State v. Schiller-Munneman’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “not addressed whether, absent custody or compelling circumstances, a defendant's invocation of the right to silence in response to police questioning may be admitted as substantive evidence at trial.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 298 Or. App. 44 - State v. Sprow

2. “[a]n out-of-court statement is not hearsay if it is offered to show the statement's effect on the listener, and the effect on the listener is relevant.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 291 Or. App. 146 - State v. Davis

3. “Id. (citing Kirkpatrick, Oregon Evidence § 801.01[3][d] at 705). And, in the state's view, that effect was relevant, because”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 291 Or. App. 146 - State v. Davis