Honan v. Moss’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
2 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2011
2 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hayes v. Richfield Oil Corp. · 34 Cal. 2d 226 - Blumberg v. M. & T. Incorporated · 18 Cal. 2d 863 - Donnelly v. Southern Pacific Co. · 128 Ohio St. 626 - J.C. Penny Co. v. Robinson · Barber v. State Highway Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The rule is succinctly stated in Cooley on Torts, Vol. 2, page 1259 (3d Ed.) viz.: * * When he (the owner or lessee) expressly or by implication invites others to come upon his premises, whether for business or for any other purpose, it is his duty to be reasonably sure that he is not inviting them into danger, and to that end he must exercise ordinary care and prudence to render the premises reasonably safe for the visit.’ ” (emphasis added)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.