Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 359 P2D 596 - Tarter v. State

Tarter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
7
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently August 2012 · most notably Bland v. Sirmons (2006), Commonwealth v. Polimeni (1977)

2 federal appellate · 54 state decisions

210196119701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nobles v. State of Georgia · 84 Okla. Crim. 97 - Sadler v. State · 95 Okla. Crim. 60 - Toms v. State · People v. . Huter · 82 Okla. Crim. 5 - Bingham v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'In a prosecution for murder the court should submit the case to the jury for consideration upon every degree of homicide which the evidence in any reasonable view of it suggests, and if the evidence tends to prove different degrees, the law on each degree which the evidence tends to prove should be submitted to the jury”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “... but only by that of a few lay witnesses on the question of insanity at the time of the shooting. Nevertheless, it was within their province to believe the testimony of the lay witnesses to [sic] disregard of the medical testimony, if they chose to do so. The law makes no distinction in weighing evidence in expert testimony and evidence of other character, and it is for the jury and not the reviewing court to determine the weight to be given such evidence. (Citations omitted), Tarter, supra, at 600 .”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““ * * * whether there is any evidence tending to reduce the degree of the homicide from murder to manslaughter, the trial court should give the defendant the benefit of any doubt * * * ””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.