Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 359 Pa. Super. 20 - Beasley v. Beasley

359 Pa. Super. 20 - Beasley v. Beasley’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
13
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

61 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably 366 Pa. Super. 19 - DeMasi v. DeMasi (1987), Klein v. Klein (1988)

61 state decisions — followed in 13 states

3201986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Pugar v. Greco · Fried v. Fried · Stern v. Stern · 103 Wis. 2d 327 - Holbrook v. Holbrook

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] sole proprietorship can be distinguished from a partnership, or a professional corporation, to which an ascertainable value can be ascribed for the purpose of buying into or withdrawing from the relationship; but it is the association, or some share of it, that is valued and not the individual partner upon which the value is placed. See Geesbreght v. Geesbreght, 570 S.W.2d 427 (Tex.Civ.App.1978). The productivity or work effort of the partner is often not the measure of the share possessed by various members of the association. That, share is a measurable and marketable commodity and is generally defined by contract. When a sole proprietor terminates his activity, the lights go out, the value of the sole proprietorship is extinguished and is nontransferable; the clients in the law firm cannot be sold, they can only be transferred and they have the absolute right to select their own future representation; nothing remains in residue which could be determined of value aside from tangible physical property, or work performed on partially completed cases, which may entitle the lawyer or his heirs to a quantum meruit payment.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[T]he advantage or benefit, which is acquired by an establishment, beyond the mere value of the capital stock, funds, or property employed therein, in consequence of general public patronage and encouragement, which it receives from constant or habitual customers, on account of its local position, or common celebrity, or reputation for skill or affluence, or punctuality, or from other accidental circumstances or necessities, or even from ancient partialities or prejudices.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[e]ffectuate economic justice between parties who are divorced. . . and insure a fair and just determination and settlement of their property rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.